Search tax-exempt hospitals
for comparison purposes.
Arkansas Valley Regional Medical Center
La Junta, CO 81050
Bed count | 25 | Medicare provider number | 060036 | Member of the Council of Teaching Hospitals | NO | Children's hospital | NO |
(as % of functional expenses, which all tax-exempt organizations report on Form 990 Schedule H)
(as % of total functional expenses)
Community Benefit Expenditures: 2017
All tax-exempt organizations file a Form 990 with the IRS for every tax year. If the tax-exempt organization operates one or more hospital facilities during the tax year, the organization must attach a Schedule H to Form 990. On Part I of Schedule H, the organization records the expenditures it made during the tax year for various types of community benefits; 9 types are shown on this web tool. By default, this web tool presents community benefit expenditures as a percentage of the organization’s functional expenses, which it reports on Form 990, Part IX, Line 25, Column A. (The more commonly heard term, ‘total operating expenses’, which organizations report to CMS, is generally about 90% of the ‘functional expenses’). The user may change the default to see the dollar expenditures.
Operating expenses $ 39,786,385 Total amount spent on community benefits as % of operating expenses$ 5,502,171 13.83 %- Amount spent in the following IRS community benefit categories:
Financial Assistance at cost as % of operating expenses$ 159,591 0.40 %Medicaid as % of operating expenses$ 5,255,962 13.21 %Costs of other means-tested government programs as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Health professions education as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Subsidized health services as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Research as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Community health improvement services and community benefit operations*
as % of operating expensesNote: these two community benefit categories are reported together on the Schedule H, part I, line 7e.$ 86,618 0.22 %Cash and in-kind contributions for community benefit* as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Community building*
as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %- * = CBI denoted preventative categories
- Community building activities details:
Did tax-exempt hospital report community building activities? Not available Number of activities or programs (optional) 0 Physical improvements and housing 0 Economic development 0 Community support 0 Environmental improvements 0 Leadership development and training for community members 0 Coalition building 0 Community health improvement advocacy 0 Workforce development 0 Other 0 Persons served (optional) 0 Physical improvements and housing 0 Economic development 0 Community support 0 Environmental improvements 0 Leadership development and training for community members 0 Coalition building 0 Community health improvement advocacy 0 Workforce development 0 Other 0 Community building expense
as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %Physical improvements and housing as % of community building expenses$ 0 Economic development as % of community building expenses$ 0 Community support as % of community building expenses$ 0 Environmental improvements as % of community building expenses$ 0 Leadership development and training for community members as % of community building expenses$ 0 Coalition building as % of community building expenses$ 0 Community health improvement advocacy as % of community building expenses$ 0 Workforce development as % of community building expenses$ 0 Other as % of community building expenses$ 0 Direct offsetting revenue $ 0 Physical improvements and housing $ 0 Economic development $ 0 Community support $ 0 Environmental improvements $ 0 Leadership development and training for community members $ 0 Coalition building $ 0 Community health improvement advocacy $ 0 Workforce development $ 0 Other $ 0
Other Useful Tax-exempt Hospital Information: 2017
In addition to community benefit and community building expenditures, the Schedule H worksheet includes sections on what percentage of bad debt can be attributable to patients eligible for financial assistance, and questions on the tax-exempt hospital's debt collection policy. When searching a specific tax-exempt hospital in this web tool, Section II provides information about bad debt and the financial assistance policy, and whether the state in which the tax-exempt hospital resides has expanded Medicaid coverage under the federal ACA.
Of the tax-exempt hospital’s overall operating expenses, amount reported as bad debt
as % of operating expenses$ 1,357,862 3.41 %Is the tax-exempt hospital considered a "sole community hospital" under the Medicare program? NO - Information about the tax-exempt hospital's Financial Assistance Policy and Debt Collection Policy
The Financial Assistance Policy section of Schedule H has changed over the years. The questions listed below reflect the questions on the 2009-2011 Schedule H forms and the answers tax-exempt hospitals provided for those years. The Financial Assistance Policy requirements were changed under the ACA. In the future, as the Community Benefit Insight web site is populated with 2021 data and subsequent years, the web tool will also be updated to reflect the new wording and requirements. In the meantime, if you have any questions about this section, we encourage you to contact your tax-exempt hospital directly.
Does the organization have a written financial assistance (charity care) policy? YES Did the tax-exempt hospital rely upon Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG) to determine when to provide free or discounted care for patients? YES Amount of the tax-exempt hospital’s bad debt (at cost) attributed to patients eligible under the organization’s financial assistance (charity care) policy
as % of operating expenses$ 0 0 %- Did the tax-exempt hospital, or an authorized third party, take any of the following collection activities before determining whether the patient was eligible for financial assistance:
Reported to credit agency Not available Under the ACA, states have the choice to expand Medicaid eligibility for their residents up to 138% of the federal poverty guidelines. The Medicaid expansion provision of the ACA did not go into effect until January 2014, so data in this web tool will not reflect each state's current Medicaid eligibility threshold. For up to date information, please visit the Terms and Glossary under the Resources tab.
After enactment of the ACA, has the state in which this tax-exempt hospital is located expanded Medicaid? YES The federal poverty guidelines (FPG) are set by the government and used to determine eligibility for many federal financial assistance programs. Tax-exempt hospitals often use FPG guidelines in their Financial Assistance policies to determine which patients will qualify for free or discounted care.
If not, is the state's Medicaid threshold for working parents at or below 76% of the federal poverty guidelines? Not available In addition to the federal requirements, some states have laws stipulating community benefit requirements as a result of tax-exemption. The laws vary from state to state and may require the tax-exempt hospitals to submit community benefit reports. Data on this web tool captures whether or not a state had a mandatory community benefit reporting law as of 2011. For more information, please see Community Benefit State Law Profiles Comparison at The Hilltop Institute.
Does the state in which the tax-exempt hospital is located have a mandatory community benefit reporting statute? NO
Community Health Needs Assessment Activities: 2017
The ACA requires all 501(c)(3) tax-exempt hospitals to conduct a Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) every three years, starting with the hospital's tax year beginning after March 23, 2012. The 2011 Schedule H included an optional section of questions on the CHNA process. This web tool includes responses for those hospitals voluntary reporting this information. The web tool will be updated to reflect changes in these questions on the 2012 and subsequent Schedule H forms.
Did the tax-exempt hospital report that they had conducted a CHNA? YES Did the CHNA define the community served by the tax-exempt hospital? YES Did the CHNA consider input from individuals that represent the broad interests of the community served by the tax-exempt hospital? YES Did the tax-exempt hospital make the CHNA widely available (i.e. post online)? YES Did the tax-exempt hospital adopt an implementation strategy to address the community needs identified by the CHNA? YES
Supplemental Information: 2017
- Statement of Program Service Accomplishments
Description of the organization's program service accomplishments for each of its three largest program services, as measured by expenses. Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations are required to report the amount of grants and allocations to others, the total expenses, and revenue, if any, for each program service reported.
4A (Expenses $ 33395718 including grants of $ 0) (Revenue $ 38479349) THE MEDICAL CENTER OPERATES AN ACUTE-CARE HOSPITAL AND LONG-TERM CARE NURSING HOME AND PROVIDES INPATIENT, OUTPATIENT, AND EMERGENCY CARE SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY REGARDLESS OF RACE AND INSURANCE. THE MEDICAL CENTER PROVIDED 4,191 INPATIENT DAYS, 43,030 OUTPATIENT VISITS, 12,532 EMERGENCY ROOM VISITS, AND 155 BIRTHS DURING THE YEAR. THE MEDICAL CENTER ALSO PROVIDES CARE TO PERSONS COVERED BY GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AT OR BELOW COST AND TO INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE UNABLE TO PAY. THE UNREIMBURSED VALUE OF PROVIDING CARE TO THESE PATIENTS WAS 362,707 FOR CHARITY CARE, 28,044,938 FOR MEDICARE, 14,503,803 FOR MEDICAID, AND 5,452,603 FOR OTHER THIRD PARTY PAYORS FOR THE YEAR.
-
Facility Information
FACILITY 1, ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL - PART V, LINE 3E IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITIZATION OF HEALTH NEEDS ARE ADDRESSED BEGINNING ON PAGE 47, OF THE LATEST CHNA LOCATED ON THE WEBSITE.
FACILITY 1, ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL - PART V, LINE 5 "WE DEPLOYED A CHNA ROUND I SURVEY TO OUR LOCAL EXPERT ADVISORS TO GAIN INPUT ON LOCAL HEALTH NEEDS AND THE NEEDS OF PRIORITY POPULATIONS. LOCAL EXPERT ADVISORS WERE LOCAL INDIVIDUALS SELECTED ACCORDING TO CRITERIA REQUIRED BY THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS AND THE HOSPITALS DESIRE TO REPRESENT THE REGIONS GEOGRAPHICALLY AND ETHNICALLY DIVERSE POPULATION. WE RECEIVED COMMUNITY INPUT FROM 26 LOCAL EXPERT ADVISORS. SURVEY RESPONSES STARTED SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 AND ENDED WITH THE LAST RESPONSE ON OCTOBER 26, 2015. ALL WRITTEN COMMENTS ARE PRESENTED VERBATIM IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS REPORT. INFORMATION ANALYSIS AUGMENTED BY LOCAL OPINIONS SHOWED HOW OTERO COUNTY RELATES TO ITS PEERS IN TERMS OF PRIMARY AND CHRONIC NEEDS AND OTHER ISSUES OF UNINSURED PERSONS, LOW-INCOME PERSONS, AND MINORITY GROUPS. RESPONDENTS COMMENTED ON WHETHER THEY BELIEVE CERTAIN POPULATION GROUPS (""PRIORITY POPULATIONS"") NEED HELP TO IMPROVE THEIR CONDITION, AND IF SO, WHO NEEDS TO DO WHAT TO IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS OF THESE GROUPS. LOCAL OPINIONS OF THE NEEDS OF PRIORITY POPULATIONS WERE ABSTRACTED IN THE FOLLOWING ""TAKEAWAY"" COMMENTS. LITERACY BARRIERS ARE LIMITING ACCESS TO CARE, LACK OF PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICES, SHORTAGE OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. ONGOING PREVENTATIVE EDUCATION, PARTICULARLY FOR DIABETES, IS NEEDED WHEN THE ANALYSIS WAS COMPLETE. WE PUT THE INFORMATION AND SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS BEFORE OUR LOCAL EXPERT ADVISORS WHO WERE ASKED TO AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS. THEY WERE FREE TO AUGMENT POTENTIAL CONCLUSIONS WITH ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OF NEED, AND NEW NEEDS DID EMERGE FROM THIS EXCHANGE. CONSULTATION WITH 20 LOCAL EXPERTS OCCURRED AGAIN VIA AN INTERNET BASED SURVEY, (""ROUND 2"", EXPLAINED BELOW) BEGINNING NOVEMBER 16, 2015 AND ENDING JANUARY 11, 2016. HAVING TAKEN STEPS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL COMMUNITY NEEDS, THE LOCAL EXPERTS THEN PARTICIPATED IN A STRUCTURED COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE CALLED A ""WISDOM OF CROWDS"" METHOD. THE PREMISE OF THIS APPROACH RELIES ON A PANEL OF EXPERTS WITH THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE COLLECTIVE WISDOM OF PARTICIPANTS IS SUPERIOR TO THE OPINION OF ANY ONE INDIVIDUAL, REGARDLESS OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS. IN THE AVRMC PROCESS, EACH LOCAL EXPERT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE NEEDS PREVIOUSLY UNIDENTIFIED AND TO CHALLENGE CONCLUSIONS DEVELOPED FROM THE DATA ANALYSIS. WHILE THERE WERE A FEW OPINIONS OF THE DATA CONCLUSIONS NOT BEING COMPLETELY ACCURATE, THE VAST MAJORITY OF COMMENTS AGREED WITH OUR FINDINGS. WE DEVELOPED A SUMMARY OF ALL NEEDS IDENTIFIED BY ANY OF THE ANALYZED DATA SETS. THE LOCAL EXPERTS THEN ALLOCATED 100 POINTS AMONG THE POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT NEED CANDIDATES, INCLUDING THE OPPORTUNITY TO AGAIN PRESENT ADDITIONAL NEEDS THAT WERE NOT IDENTIFIED FROM THE DATA. A RANK ORDER OF PRIORITIES EMERGED, WITH SOME NEEDS RECEIVING NONE OR VIRTUALLY NO SUPPORT, AND OTHER NEEDS RECEIVING IDENTICAL POINT ALLOCATIONS. WE DICHOTOMIZED THE RANK ORDER OF PRIORITIZED NEEDS INTO TWO GROUPS ""SIGNIFICANT- AND ""OTHER"" IDENTIFIED NEEDS. OUR CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING SIGNIFICANT NEEDS WAS BASED ON A DESCENDING FREQUENCY RANK ORDER OF THE NEEDS BASED ON TOTAL POINTS CAST BY THE LOCAL EXPERTS, FURTHER RANKED BY A DESCENDING FREQUENCY COUNT OF THE NUMBER OF LOCAL EXPERTS CASTING ANY POINTS FOR THE NEED. BY OUR DEFINITION, A SIGNIFICANT NEED HAD TO INCLUDE ALL RANK ORDERED NEEDS UNTIL AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF ALL POINTS WERE INCLUDED AND TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, REPRESENTED POINTS ALLOCATED BY A MAJORITY OF VOTING LOCAL EXPERTS. THE DETERMINATION OF THE BREAK POINT - ""SIGNIFICANT"" AS OPPOSED TO ""OTHER"" - WAS A QUALITATIVE INTERPRETATION BY QUORUM AND THE AVRMC EXECUTIVE TEAM WHERE A REASONABLE BREAK POINT IN RANK ORDER OCCURRED."
FACILITY 1, ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL - PART V, LINE 6B THE HOSPITAL COLLABORATED WITH AND OBTAINED ASSISTANCE IN CONDUCTING THIS CHNA FROM QUORUM HEALTH RESOURCES (QHR).
FACILITY 1, ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL - PART V, LINE 11 WE DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE RESOURCES TO SOLVE ALL THE PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. SOME ISSUES ARE BEYOND THE MISSION OF THE HOSPITAL AND ACTION IS BEST SUITED FOR A RESPONSE BY OTHERS. SOME IMPROVEMENTS WILL REQUIRE PERSONAL ACTIONS BY INDIVIDUALS RATHER THAN THE RESPONSE OF AN ORGANIZATION. WE VIEW THIS AS A PLAN FOR HOW WE, ALONG WITH OTHER ORGANIZATIONS AND AGENCIES, CAN COLLABORATE TO BRING THE BEST EACH HAS TO OFFER TO ADDRESS THE MORE PRESSING IDENTIFIED NEEDS. BY DEFINITION, THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED AS LOW PRIORITY AND FOR WHICH AVRMC HOLDS LOW RESPONSILBILITY FOR IMPLEMENTATION ARE NEEDS TO WHICH THE HOSPITAL MAY DEVOTE RESOURCES WHILE (IN MOST CASES) MONITORING BUT OTHERWISE NOT ADDRESSING. REASONS FOR THIS RESPONSE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: ACTIONS REQUIRED ARE BEYOND THE MISSION OF AVRMC, AVRMC CAN BE MORE EFFECTIVE APPLYING ITS RESOURCES TO HIGHER PRIORITY NEEDS, THE HOSPITAL DOES NOT POSSESS THE EXPERTISE NECESSARY FOR SUBSTANTIVE POSITIVE IMPROVEMENT, ACTIONS CONTEMPLATED FOR IMPLEMENTATION FALL MORE APPROPRIATELY TO THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OTHERS OTHER THAN PROVIDING ENCOURAGEMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS FOR SOME NEEDS REQUIRE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS BY INDIVIDUALS MODIFYING THEIR PERSONAL HABITS RATHER THAN A RESPONSE BY AN ORGANIZATION OR THE HEALTH SYSTEM. THE BEST USE OF AVRMC RESOURCES IS TO FOCUS ON RESOLVING OR IMPROVING HIGHER PRIORITY NEEDS RATHER THAN ATTEMPTING TO RESPOND TO EVERYTHING WITH SMALL, PERHAPS INEFFECTIVE, EFFORTS.
FACILITY 1, ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL - PART V, LINE 13B THE ONLY CHARITY CARE DEFINED BY AVRMC'S PURPOSE IS PATIENTS THAT QUALIFY FOR COLORADO INDIGENT CARE.
-
Supplemental Information
PART I, LINE 7 - COSTING METHODOLOGY EXPLANATION THE COSTING METHODOLOGY USED TO DETERMINE THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IS THE COST TO CHARGE RATIO.
PART III, LINE 2 - BAD DEBT EXPENSE METHODOLOGY THE COST METHODOLOGY USED IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNTS REPORTED AS BAD DEBT EXPENSE IS USING A COST-TO-CHARGE RATIO. THE AMOUNT OF BAD DEBTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO PATIENT ACCOUNTS IS MULTIPLIED BY THE RATIO OF PATIENT CARE COST TO CHARGES CALCULATE THE ESTIMATED COST OF BAD DEBTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO PATIENT ACCOUNTS. A NUMBER OF PATIENTS ARE TRULY UNABLE TO PAY THEIR OUT- OF-POCKET LIABILITY, BUT DO NOT COMPLETE THE PROCESS REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE HOSPITAL'S CHARITY CARE POLICY. THESE PATIENTS WOULD QUALIFY FOR CHARITY CARE IF THEY COMPLETED THE PAPERWORK, SO THE BAD DEBT EXPENSE ASSOCIATED WITH TREATING THEM SHOULD BE TREATED AS A COMMUNITY BENEFIT.
BAD DEBT EXPENSE FOOTNOTE TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THE PATIENT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FOOTNOTE OF THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IS FOUND IN FOOTNOTE 3 ON PAGE 12 OF THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THE PROVISION FOR BAD DEBTS IS ALSO INCLUDED IN FOOTNOTE 3 OF THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
PART III, LINE 8 - MEDICARE EXPLANATION MEDICARE SHORTFALL WAS CALCULATED USING THE MEDICARE COST REPORT FOR THE YEAR. IRS REVENUE RULING 69-545, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT STANDARD FOR NONPROFIT HOSPITALS, STATES THAT IF A HOSPITAL SERVES PATIENTS WITH GOVERNMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INCLUDING MEDICARE, THEN THIS IS AN INDICATION THAT THE HOSPITAL OPERATES TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH OF THE COMMUNITY. THIS IMPLIES THAT TREATING MEDICARE PATIENTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS A COMMUNITY BENEFIT.
PART III, LINE 9B - COLLECTION PRACTICES EXPLANATION PATIENTS ARE NOTIFIED OF THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM VIA PATIENT FINANCIAL COUNSELORS, BROCHURES AVAILABLE IN THE ADMISSION AND BUSINESS OFFICE AREAS OF THE HOSPITAL, AND ON OUR WEBSITE AT THE FOLLOWING URL: HTTP://WWW.AVRMC.ORG/GETPAGE.PHP?NAME=FINANCIAL- ASSISTANCE-PRGRAM&SUB=FOR%20PATIENTS
PART VI, LINE 2 - NEEDS ASSESSMENT THE CHNA IS THE PRIMARY METHOD TO ASSESS THE HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY SERVED. HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT MANAGERS, MANAGEMENT, AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE COMPRISED OF MEMBERS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. THEY ARE ABLE TO GATHER AND COMMUNICATE THE HEALTH CARE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY IT SERVES AND CONTINUALLY ADDRESS THEM AT STAFF AND BOARD MEETINGS. THE MOST RECENTLY ADOPTED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT CAN BE FOUND AT THE FOLLOWING URL: HTTP://WWW.AVRMC.ORG/GETPAGE.PHP?NAME=COMMUNITY-HEALTH- NEEDS&CHILD=COMMUNITY+HEALTH+NEEDS
PART VI, LINE 3 - PATIENT EDUCATION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE THE MEDICAL CENTER PROVIDES A BROCHURE TO EACH PATIENT OUTLINING THE GUIDELINES TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE. IF APPROPRIATE, WE GET THEM AN APPOINTMENT WITH A FINANCIAL COUNSELOR. THE BROCHURE CAN BE FOUND ON OUR WEBSITE AT THE FOLLOWING URL: HTTP://WWW.AVRMC.ORG/GETPAGE.PHP?NAME=FINANCIAL-ASSISTANCE-PRGRAM&SUB=FOR %20PATIENTS
PART VI, LINE 4 - COMMUNITY INFORMATION AVRMC, IN CONJUNCTION WITH QUORUM, DEFINES ITS SERVICE AREA AS OTERO COUNTY IN COLORADO, WHICH INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING ZIP CODES: 81039 FOWLER, 81050 LA JUNTA, 81058 MANZANOLA, AND 81067 ROCKY FORD. IN 2014, THE HOSPITAL RECEIVED 72.0% OF ITS PATIENTS FROM THIS AREA. COUNTY DATA IS USED AS MOST INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE GEOGRAPHIC LEVEL OF A ZIP CODE. THE 2015 POPULATION FOR OTERO COUNTY IS ESTIMATED TO BE 19,013, AND IS EXPECTED TO INCREASE AT A RATE OF 0.5%, PROJECTING A 2020 POPULATION OF 19,100. THE POPULATION INCREASE IS IN CONTRAST TO THE COLORADO STATE AVERAGE RATE OF POPULATION INCREASE OF 6.3% AND THE NATIONAL GROWTH RATE OF 3.5%. APPROXIMATELY 55.1 % OF THE OTERO COUNTY POPULATION IS OF WHITE, NON- HISPANIC ETHNIC ORIGIN, COMPARED TO THE U S POPULATION PERCENTAGE OF 61.8%. THE HISPANIC POPULATION OF OTERO COUNTY IS 41.2%, COMPARED TO 17.6% NATIONALLY. THE 65+ POPULATION OF OTERO COUNTY 1S 19.7% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION COMPARED TO THE OVERALL US AT 14.7%. THE 2015 PERCENTAGE OF CHILD-BEARING-AGE FEMALES IN OTERO COUNTY IS 17.0%, WHILE IN COLORADO AS A WHOLE IT IS 19.9%, AND FOR THE US 19.7%. THE 2015 OTERO COUNTY MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS 34,037, WHICH IS CONSIDERABLY LOWER THAN THE NATIONAL MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF 53,375. OTERO COUNTY'S UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AS OF 2015 IS 4.7%. THIS IS LESS THAN THE NATIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF 5.1%.
PART VI, LINE 5 - PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH THE MEDICAL CENTER'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS COMPRISED OF PERSONS WHO RESIDE IN THE LA JUNTA, COLORADO AREA. THE MAJORITY OF THE ORGANIZATION'S BOARD MEMBERS ARE NEITHER EMPLOYEES NOR CONTRACTORS OF THE MEDICAL CENTER. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS MADE MOSTLY OF COMMUNITY BUSINESS PEOPLE INTERESTED IN MAINTAINING QUALITY HEALTH CARE IN LA JUNTA. MEDICAL STAFF PRIVILEGES ARE OPEN TO ALL MEDICAL PROVIDERS WITH ACTIVE LICENSURE. WE ENCOURAGE PRACTITIONERS FROM NUMEROUS SPECIALTIES TO MEET THE EVER EXPANDING HEALTHCARE NEEDS OF THE COMMUNITY. ANY SURPLUS FUNDS ARE REINVESTED INTO OUR FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND EMPLOYEE EDUCATION.
PART VI, LINE 6 - AFFILIATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM N/A
PART VI, LINE 7 - STATE FILING OF COMMUNITY BENEFIT REPORT COLORADO